Zipline Conservative

January 21, 2010

OREGON: NO 66/67

Filed under: Arrogance of Power,Beat Down,Corruption — SwittersB @ 9:06 AM
Tags: , , ,

Following The Money

Who are the big contributors to the “yes” side?

  • Oregon Education Association, which represents 47,000 teachers: $827,000
  • Service Employees International Union Local 503, which represents 45,000 state workers: $493,000
  • American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, which represents 27,000 corrections officers and local government workers: $400,000
  • SEIU (National Chapter): $250,000
  • American Federation of Teachers, which represents 11,000 Oregon educators, mostly at the community-college level: $200,000
  • Largest individual donor—Leland Larson, a longtime giver to progressive causes and landlord of Dignity Village: $10,000

Who are the big contributors to the “no” side?

Unsurprisingly, many of those most opposed to the new taxes face a bite from the new tax on sales. The companies who stand to pay the biggest increase are those with large sales but small profits—so-called “small-margin” businesses—such as:

  • Construction contractors, who work on large-dollar, slim-margin projects. The total from contractors and their executives: $300,000
  • Oregon Local Grocery Association, perhaps the slimmest-margin industry in the state: $226,000
  • Timber companies, the most reliable source of money for conservative causes in Oregon politics: $237,000
  • Oregon Restaurant Association, whose members work in a notoriously small-margin business: $140,000
  • Utilities—although as a sector they will be hardest hit by the increased income taxes because they have large in-state sales and profits, they can pass along the increases to customers: $75,000
  • Largest individual donors: Nike CEO Phil Knight and Columbia Sportswear CEO Tim Boyle, $50,000 each. Both have been critics of government inefficiency. “I compare the Oregon tax system to a stereo system built around an 8-track player,” Boyle says. “There is widespread agreement that it’s not a good system, that there are better systems, and that it is outdated and needs improvement. But instead of working to find and implement those improvements, someone rushes in and decides that the answer is to just turn up the volume.”

Willamette Week “Class Warfare”

No one more confused than an Oregon  ProRegressive. Enough for me the OEA & SEIU sunk over a million bucks in….speaks volumes.  VOTE NO!


1 Comment »

  1. If measures 66 and 67 pass:

    My company sees a direct expense due to the increase of several thousand dollars.

    As a result we have developed a business plan for accepting these new increases:

    1. We will discontinue our corporate donation of $6,000.00 to the oregon food bank.
    2. We have selected two positions to lay off.
    3. We are trimming 401k matching distributions by 4%
    4. We are increasing our wholesale price by 1.5% and labor general costs by 6%
    5. We will investigate moving administrative offices to Vancouver WA
    6. We will trim all other corporate donations by 48%
    7. We will cut non-union colas for 2010, and freeze all other non-union wages
    8. We will implement a hiring freeze for 2010

    As a corporation, we will accept the new taxes as a cost of doing business. As a cost of doing business… we will pass that cost on to our customers.

    Comment by dda — January 22, 2010 @ 4:27 PM | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: