Well, I can’t be a hypocrite…I love a perfect ass as well as the next guy or gal…(depending upon gender). But, it is like this…I can be standing at a gathering and decency and propriety calls for me not to contemplate the physical attributes of my son’s or daughter’s female friends. Respect is shown, the eyes averted. Obama, The Man Whore, is undisciplined. He wasn’t checking out her flats. He was checking out the sheer dress and the little tush beneath. Sarkozy confirms. The effort to depict the Obama’s as sweetness and light has always been BS…Vera Baker remains the unresolved skeleton in that family closet…power acquisition does not change that…. (‘Man Whore’ attributed to SPP)
This image tells us a lot more about photography and the truth contained/revealed in/by images. Rip an image free of its context in time, cut only 1/1000th of a second from the fabric of time, and you do not always get an image that accurately represents the full moment. As a former newsphotographer, I worked for more than three decades as a couple of papers, I have seen this time and time again.
http://rockinon.wordpress.com
Comment by rockinon — July 12, 2009 @ 4:17 AM |
Ken,
You are of course correct. But, as the frozen images continue to mount perhaps we will not be able to lay it to the varities of the shutter and realize it for what it is……if for that fraction of a second, that position in time…the eyes of Sarkozy and Obama are focused on that little tush….then they were….Sarkozy seems focused. I thank you for the input….worth considering in many instances.
Comment by swittersb — July 12, 2009 @ 9:00 AM |
Correction for above: …at a couple of papers… and not as
Comment by rockinon — July 12, 2009 @ 4:35 AM |