Zipline Conservative

August 1, 2009

Permitted Insemination? Quality of Life Requires a Balance of Life & Death (Thank The State, We Have Them to Guide Us)

population control authoritarianism

“Then again, it’s one thing to be a bumbling soothsayer and it’s quite another to underestimate the resourcefulness of mankind enough to ponder how “population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution . . .,” as Holdren did in “Ecoscience” in 1977.

The book, in fact, is sprinkled with comparable statements that passively discuss how coercive population control methods might rescue the world from … well, humans.”

dumbEver more clear, the Nanny tells you what to do, when to do it and whether you can do it….what to eat, what to drive, how to live, who will live, who will die, how to think, how to speak, when your  turn will be. Ever more clear also, No Democrat or Republican stands in front of this power grab. How to resist this? My kid went to buy ammo the other day for plinking. He states the shelves were sparse for tactical ammo….  I get the mind set. But, what to do now before you feel the necessity to lock and load? Are we only a country of the manipulated swing voter? Tell me somewhere the supposed intelligent 30 somethings that readily vote for anything Left of Center see the dangers here….dangers far beyond anything Bush, Cheney, Rove or Homeland Security represented. Seriously….awaken to the slick manipulations. Leftist Brainwashing for equity has gone too far beyond equality of opportunity…even that is out of synch…

brainwashing 

health_coverage

income_gap

Social Justice? Equality, Media Brainwashing (I always find this hilarious as the Leftist Brainwashing is so pronounced that beyond a bit of Fox News and talk radio there is perpetual BS flowing on Leftist agendas).

“Freedom is messy. In free societies, people will fall through the cracks – drink too much, eat too much, buy unaffordable homes, fail to make prudent provision for health care and much else. But the price of being relieved of all those tiresome choices by a benign paternal government is far too high.” Mark Steyn 

Read Ed Spaulding’s Comment (my bold text)

March 12, 2009

Obama’s Vision: Nanny State or worse? I am so done…so pissed.

Obamanation=Nanny State

Obamanation=Nanny State

Random Impressions: Shit storm of info to confuse and give the sheep the impression of positive action supported by the adoring msm prop. machine; Nanny State at a minimum; Pelosi is disgusting, Reid is disgusting, Republicans are done…I hate the Republicans; something new is needed; Shut up Steele, you are rediculous and so is the party that propped you up; Castro, Chavez and Che are resurrecting; where are the anti war crowd over Iraq and Afghanistan???? No debate on assault to freedom; my anger increases almost enough to don a ‘Fuck Obama’ bumper sticker…yet my civility gets in the way; no intelligent debate on how we got to this…still the last 8 years shit…no attachment to Demwits or Clinton decisions in the 90’s; we are polarized and I think a clash is inevitable that will show these marxist for what they are…force their hand? Same techniques the Left has always used…Where is Ayers in this and HOW OFTEN DOES Obama TALK TO AYERS? Card check Union shit..same old union shit..fuck unions…thugs…keep talking your ’middle class’ shit..Leftist thugs..the one’s that would do the dirty work…in no uncertain terms Fuck Ted Kennedy!    

     http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/11/mattera-it-is-our-goddamned-business/

Oh and here is the biggy..the capper on Immigration..the door opening to forever change our culture….this is so wrong and nary a peep!

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/10/la-raza-lobbyist-gets-ethics-waiver/

Sorry for the anger…but I am so done. I am pissed off and any compassion I have is evaporating in disgust….spoiled, pretentious Libs sitting by and saying nothing while they dine at their hipster estabs, and act totally Euro…what a disgusting mix this is… 

November 22, 2008

Saul Alinsky’s/Antonio Gamsci’s Strategies & Study Materials (Familiar msm propaganda techniques…hey?)

alinsky1Known as the “father of modern American radicalism,” Saul D. Alinsky (1909-1972) developed strategies and tactics that take the enormous, unfocused emotional energy of grassroots groups and transform it into effective anti-government and anti-corporate activism. Activist organizations teach his ideas widely taught today as a set of model behaviors, and they use these principles to create an emotional commitment to victory – no matter what.

RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” (Grievance~Suit) Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)

RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)

RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)  (Note the repetitive hypocrisy attacks against Republicans)

RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” (empowered to be an asshole is fun) They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)

RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)

RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)

RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)

RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)

RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)

RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

http://www.geocities.com/WallStreet/8925/alinsky.htm

http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm

http://maggiesfarm.anotherdotcom.com/archives/7423-Alinsky-and-Gramsci.html

http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=260

http://wildmonk.net/EuropeLeft.aspx

socialist1

November 16, 2008

Chicago Change Agents & Conspiracy (Coincidences and Agitator Theorists)

I just love this report and it is soooo tempting to float a conspiracy, like all the linkage between these Leftist Community Organizers and Bank Liar Loans and the Regressives covering for this abuse and the sudden collapse right before the election and now a massive, progressive take over of banking and maybe industry. A coincidence I am sure. Just those odd little degrees of intersection that always exist. Hell, if the whack jobs can entertain the 9-11 Truthers and Chem Trails and Cheney-Haliburton mierda, then I can wonder about these oddities.     

Surprise!!!

Surprise!!!

Alinsky’s “training manual” for community organizers, “Rules for Radicals,” states that community organizers are primarily agitators, who must “Fan the resentments of the people of a community; fan the latent hostilities of many of the people to the point of overt expression – he must search out controversy and issues… An organizer must stir up dissatisfaction and discontentment [sic]…. He knows that values are relative…. Truth to him is relative and changing.” [315]

 

 

 

Note that Alinsky’s work also influenced the creation of the “Cloward-Piven Strategy,” named after Columbia University professors Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven. Their strategy involves taking action to force deliberate failure in society, to foster change toward socialism, by overloading the bureaucracy with impossible demands, lawsuits, holding officials to the extreme letter of the law, etc. The Cloward-Piven method is to push society into an economic collapse, thus forcing a fear and resentment of capitalism, making it easier to usher in socialism. The Cloward-Piven strategy is one of the tactics used by “community organizers” (e.g., storming welfare offices and violently demanding immediate action) to impose intentional strains on the system, and to force the hiring of more government workers than necessary to deal with their ever-increasing demands. [327]

Obama learns from the Alinsky crowd the method for getting people to support radical change they would ordinarily not be willing to accept. “They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and change the future.” Thus, just as it has been the theme of most Democrat Presidential campaigns over the last 30 years, so is it Obama’s: “Everything is terrible and headed in the wrong direction, your lives are in shambles, greedy capitalism is at fault, and you need to trust a bigger government and my plans to solve all your problems.” [192]

 

For three years, Obama is the director of the Developing Communities Project (DCP), part of the “Gamaliel Foundation,” another Alinsky-like group which uses “in your face” tactics and threats against banks to obtain more loans to people in poor neighborhoods. Gamaliel’s co-founder and executive director is Gregory Galluzzo, who served as a trainer and mentor during Obama’s community activist days in Chicago. [227,228,337]

http://www.colony14.net/id41.html

October 28, 2008

Barack Obama (Neo-Marxism, Gradualism & Slick Deceptions)

Ok, a qualifier is in order up front. The author for much of the info below is of the persuasion that there is a World Order that secretly manipulates the world etc. Coupled with that paranoid assumption is a strong religious tone (I admittedly took the liberty of editing out the religious portions). Now, all that said, paranoia and religion aside (at least for now) there is a bounty of theory here that is hugely necessary to understand. Why? Because it goes toward the thought processes linked to infiltration, transformation, altering the public’s belief system through graduated compromise. This is good stuff to think about. Right now it oozes Obama et al. Read all the passages and related links. Some ventures off into CFR stuff but it is enough to make you think about the process of CHANGE.   

“ALL THE elements were present: the individual stories told by real people of their situations and hardships, the packed-to-the rafters crowd, the crowd’s chanting of key phrases and names, the action on the spot of texting and phoning to show instant support and commitment to jump into the political battle, the rallying selections of music, the setting of the agenda by the power people. The Democratic National Convention had all the elements of the perfectly organized event, Saul Alinsky style.”

“Barack Obama’s training in Chicago by the great community organizers is showing its effectiveness. It is an amazingly powerful format, and the method of my late father always works to get the message out and get the supporters on board. When executed meticulously and thoughtfully, it is a powerful strategy for initiating change and making it really happen. Obama learned his lesson well”.

“I am proud to see that my father’s model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local community organizing to affect the Democratic campaign in 2008. It is a fine tribute to Saul Alinsky as we approach his 100th birthday.”

L. DAVID ALINSKY
Medfield

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/letters/articles/2008/08/31/son_sees_fathers_handiwork_in_convention/?s_campaign=8315

Notes on Saul Alinsky and Neo-Marxism:“Alinsky’s tactics were based, not on Stalin’s revolutionary violence, but on the Neo-Marxist strategies of  Antonio Gramsci, an Italian Communist. Relying on gradualism, infiltration and the dialectic process rather than a bloody revolution, Gramsci’s transformational Marxism was so subtle that few even noticed the deliberate changes.        

  

“From Twisting Truth Through Group Consensus: “Tension, created by diversity, is essential to the dialectic process. It energizes members and — when manipulated by well-trained facilitators — produces Synergy. You can’t guide people toward synthesis (compromise) unless there are opposing views — both “thesis and antithesis.” That’s why the consensus process must include all these elements:

  • a diverse group

  • dialoguing to consensus

  • over a social issue

  • led by a trained facilitator

  • toward a pre-planned outcome.

The true dialectic group never reaches a final consensus, for “continual change” is an ongoing process: one step today, another tomorrow. To permanently change the way we think and relate to each other, our leaders must set the stage for conflict and compromise week after week, year after year. Dialectical thinking and group consensus must become as normal as eating. Eventually, people learn to discard their old mental anchors and boundaries — all the facts and certainties that built firm convictions. They become like boats adrift, always ready to shift with the changing winds and currents.”   

“Total Quality Management [TQM] is based upon the Hegelian dialectic, invented by Georg Wilhelm Freidrich Hegel, a transformational Marxist social psychologist. Briefly, the Hegelian dialectic process works like this: a diverse group of people (in the church, this is a mixture of believers (thesis) and unbelievers (antithesis), gather in a facilitated meeting (with a trained facilitator/teacher/group leader/change agent), using group dynamics (peer pressure), to discuss a social issue (or dialogue the Word of God), and reach a pre-determined outcome (consensus, compromise, or synthesis).”

 “When (a firmly held belief) is dialogued (as opposed to being taught didactically) between believers and unbelievers… and consensus is reached – agreement that all are comfortable with – then the message of (the firmly held belief) has been watered down… and the participants have been conditioned to accept (and even celebrate) their compromise (synthesis).  The new synthesis becomes the starting point (thesis) for the next meeting, and the process of continual change (innovation) continues.”  “The fear of alienation from the group is the pressure that prevents an individual from standing firm for the truth of the (firmly held belief), and such a one usually remains silent (self-editing).  The fear of man’s (rejection) overrides the fear (the firmly held belief).  The end result is a ‘paradigm shift’ in how one processes factual information.”  

http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm

Obama (A Crack Opens into the Leftist Freak Show Tent)

Filed under: Obama, Politics, The Culture, The Left — SwittersB @ 4:46 p09
Tags: , , , , ,

http://www.rightwingnews.com/

“The government does not exist to determine the acceptable level of wealth of its individual citizens.  For government to assume that role, it would have to end private property rights and assume all property belonged to the State.  That is classic Marxism, and as Barbara West of WFTV noted, it runs in Marx’s classic philosophy of “from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs”.  That economic direction has been an abject failure everywhere it has been tried, and in many cases resulted in famines that killed millions of people.”

Thank you, Joe the Plumber! There would not have been a leak of the intended plan had not Joe asked the question, then Obama would have not drawn the curtain back a crack to expose the freak show inside the carnival tent. 

All the associations of the past (do I need to recount them…plenty in my archives) pointed to what most probably his political philosophy was and is. Now previous interviews, writings and ‘toasts’ leak out or are smothered. Now, more than ever, I believe Obama is a frightening example of Leftist fast track infiltration. Prepped, nurtured, prepared, inserted, cleaned up and then pushed out that crack of the Leftist Circus Tent and there he stands…the consumate barker drawing the masses forth. Frankly, I do not want to see the bearded lady, the contortionist or midgets juggling torches. It is all a freak show distraction while our pockets get picked (no offense to midgets and women with hormone problems).       

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/10/27/smells-like-socialist-spirit/

September 27, 2008

Anarchism (A Little Light Reading into Left-Right Anarchist’ Thought)

This stuff makes my head hurt, but it does cause you to think beyond our limited education re our country’s institutional origins. A whirlwind of theory, history, conspiracy creates a dizzying array of possibilities. Easy to look away to regain some sense of balance. Are we like that character Truman Burbank or his audience in The Truman Show? Not sure, but every once in awhile it is good to read this stuff, especially long about a good ol’ bailout or two. 

 ’In early America, for example, it was the northeastern mercantilists consisting of banking, shipping and land magnates led by Alexander Hamilton who initiated the Federalist coup against the libertarian Articles of Confederation and established the centralist presidential state for the purpose of advancing mercantilist commercial interests.’  

http://attackthesystem.com/capitalism-versus-free-enterprise-a-review-of-kevin-carsons-the-iron-fist-behind-the-invisible-hand/

Blog at WordPress.com.