Mallick The Swine
I have always thought Greta V. to be one of the most balanced and objective reporters on Fox News. I originally thought she was somewhat Liberal, but cannot recall why now and that is the point. She does not betray her personal position, and hence, she reports. So, given her response to a Canadian reporter’s comments about Sarah Palin, it is interesting to wonder how many Americans, outside of the ‘White Trash’ circuit (my circuit apparently) are also a bit offended by the slander and liabling of Sarah Palin? Obviously, as you watch this video unfold, you will see Greta eventually cross a line I imagine she always tries to stay behind…this time she did not. She will self correct..she is that kind of professional…but still I wonder how many professional women are torn over this smear campaign.. (Thank you, Greta for the rare lapse)
And, as Hot Air notes and the video sets forth, the hypocrisy and lunacy of Canadian Human Right’s Commissions and the smothering of speech from the Right, should raise an eyebrow here in the U.S. If Obama wins then prepare to launch an all out campaign against him and the Democratically controlled Congress if the Fairness Doctrine is uttered as it will be a first step in curbing free speech.
Apparently, the CBC supports such demogoguery and stereotypical reporting. It is too bad that Canada allows itself to be force fed with the Socialist feeding tube. Canadian contempt for the US is unfortuanate. Always nice to bash the US.
Despite perceptions that Sen. John McCain has spent more time on the attack, Sen. Barack Obama aired more negative advertising last week than did the Arizona Republican, says a study released yesterday.
Seventy-seven percent of the Illinois Democrat’s commercials were negative during the week after the Republican National Convention, compared with 56 percent of the spots run by McCain.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/17/AR2008091703581.html
“If we’re going to ask questions about, you know, who has been promulgating negative ads that are completely unrelated to the issues at hand, I think I win that contest pretty handily,” Obama said.
Comment by james — September 19, 2008 @ 4:46 p09 |
Calling Mallick a pig does disservice to the pigs. Fortunately Ms.
Palin will long be remembered after Mallick is dust. My wife and
I remember our visits to Canada with great warmth and affection
and look forward to visiting again with the warm and friendly
people who have been sadly hurt by Mallick’s sewer mouth.
Comment by Jim Parker — September 23, 2008 @ 4:46 p09 |
You are exactly right Jim. I have had many wonderful trips up into BC and have always found everyone to be exceptionally kind…my apologies to the Pigs and any slights to the North!
Comment by swittersb — September 23, 2008 @ 4:46 p09 |
An open letter to Hubert T. Lacroix
President of the Canadian Braodcasting Corporation
Dear Sir;
As a long time and sometimes vocal supporter of the CBC in its past problems with the CRTC, ( http://www.crtc.gc.ca/Eng/transcripts/1999/tb0316a.htm ) and a Canadian living in the USA; I find Heather Mallick’s rant “Mighty wind blows through Republican Convention” (attached below) offensive and worse that tabloid gibberish. I find it inconceivable that the editorial standards of the once proud Canadian Broadcasting Corporation declined below that of the National Inquirer. In fact I would challenge you to read any Inquirer story in contradistinction to Ms Mallick’s sub-tabloid journalistic style; The Inquirer story would quote sources of information, use correct English and never stoop to profane language or the F___ word. Mallick only quotes two sources of minor relevance and begins her rant with the greatest journalistic faux pas “I assume”.
Does this mean that Ms Mallick made an assumption on Senator McCain’s reasons for choosing Governor Palin and that the rest of the information was gathered personally using the time tested journalistic creed of who what where when and why?
Ms Mallick seems quite well versed in the sexual inadequacies of Republican men; has she been, unbeknownst to the Canadian public, a latter day Mata Hari in the employ of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) bedding republican men for pillow talk secrets? Does this also mean that Ms Mallick has spied on the alleged secret meetings and had extensive hands on experience regarding their irresponsibility with semen while postponing household repairs?
Ms Mallick’s admitted feminist stance has to leave one wondering where she and alleged other women receive their so called resentment training for nursing terrible hatred towards each other? From the amount of testosterone (even promoting firearm violence towards Levi Johnson) flowing through her vitriolic attack on governor Palin, saying she really isn’t female, can the question be asked; Does Ms Mallick have a severe case of Vagina envy?
Ms Mallick must surely be a legend in her own mind to believe that these alleged other women can suppress the learned same sex hatred through self flagellation and reading her trashy column.
Ms Mallick allows that “(john) Doyle’s job includes watching a lot of reality television”. Does this mean her statement “(governor) Palin has a toned-down version of the porn actress look favored by this decade’s woman” comes from extensive first hand experience of watching films of that genre?
From attacks on Governor Palin’s personal appearance and of her family, not once has Ms Mallick discussed the genuine pros or cons of the Republican Vice-presidential nominee vs. the Democratic nominee. Nor has she done any journalistic exposé regarding George Soros’ financial manipulation of the Democratic nomination process that stole the nomination from Hillary Clinton.
Boiled down to its essence Ms Mallick’s column is pure and simple hatred; hate mongering towards the Palin family, hatred for people she identifies as white trash, who she and Thomas Frank allow “vote Republican on social issues to give themselves the only self-esteem available to their broken, economically abused existence.” It is elitist and condescending like a later day Marie Antoinette with Cake or Death; devoid of factual journalism.
Considering Canada has well honed anti Hate statutes, why has Ms Mallick not been summarily guillotined from her Canadian Taxpayer subsidized position with the CBC? Perhaps there is tacit agreement within the Marxist feminist hierarchy to which she reports as to her journalistic bent. Where is Mammy Yokum “good is better than evil because it’s nicer” when you need her to wash Ms Mallick’s mouth out with homemade lye soap or deliver a “Goodnight Irene Punch” to restore decency and integrity to the CBC, as you are not holding Ms Mallick to the same litmus test that you publicize for outside contributors. Listed Below
Desmond McGrath
A Newfoundland Patriot living in socioeconomic exile amongst the wonderful Cajuns of the southern USA.
Guidelines for Submissions to CBCNews.ca
Tell us your story, be a part of the news team. CBC.ca wants you to participate in online comments, video uploads and photo submissions.
COMMENTS
What kind of comments are suitable for CBC.ca?
We want your perspective. Probe, analyze, inform. Challenge, advocate, debate. Inspire, entertain, enjoy. Your contributions make our online publishing and on-air programming richer, the conversations more lively and diverse.
What is and isn’t acceptable?
Please keep your submissions relevant to the topic.
Be civil.
We want to hear your own opinion. Please don’t include lengthy excerpts from other posts.
When you are writing about legal issues, remember that people are innocent until proven guilty (that may mean using words such as “allegedly”).
Please do not post press releases, commercial promotions or external web addresses.
Always avoid:
Racist, sexist and offensive language.
Personal attacks and defamatory statements.
Breaking copyright rules (that includes copying and pasting excepts from other sites without attribution)
Violating someone’s privacy
Threats or suggesting committing a criminal act.
Insensitive comments regarding the death or injury of private individuals, especially children
Important note: If you violate any of these rules, then your comment will not be posted and your account may be suspended.
Comment by Desmond McGrath — September 28, 2008 @ 4:46 p09 |